Skip to main content

Busy, busy

As I look at the post-election crisis in Belarus, I join lots of others in wondering about the limitations of democracy. Coupled with the musings of Trump about whether he will actually leave the White House if he doesn't like November's result, these are challenging times for democrats, perhaps in the USA, opportunities for Democrats.

Today in our Parliament's Environment Committee meeting, we resume consideration of the distribution of powers post Brexit. Or perhaps that's re-distribution as the UK Government seeks to retake control over powers lying in Edinburgh since 1999.

But we shouldn't necessarily ignore some opportunities. The UK Government's white paper on the state's internal market is a threat, yes. But could it also be an opportunity?

It requires mutual acceptance of standards set by one jurisdiction by all the others. So let's think about the proposals to dramatically lower food standards. Align the USA on chlorinated chicken, hormone and antibiotic-treated beef, and pesticide residues in food which are a thousand times higher than we have had until now. Oh, and non-zero bacterial loads.

Suppose the first legislation on the subject comes not from Westminster but from Northern Ireland, Scotland or Wales. All have administrative, legislative and political systems that are substantially more agile than the lethargic and dysfunctional Westminster and Whitehall machine. And a political and community consensus against lowering food standards.

Let's give effect to our own standards at the earliest possible opportunity. The standards we currently have. And let's see mutual recognition in action. Well, we always dream.

But when Westminster attacks our food standards, I just have a feeling that that will be quite a crisis for them. Not on the scale of the dictator of Belarus declaring that the opposition leader had garnered less than 10% of the general election vote to her cause when exit polls suggest she has won.

Opposing the imposition of the poor US food standards upon us does not carry the personal risk that standing up to a dictator does, but it similarly offers a lever to reassert a genuine power of the people against the UK's most centralising Government, outside of world wars.

Each Committee meeting might see us constructing another brick in the wall of our defence against them. So as there are but 45 minutes before we sit down, 0830 today, and I have yet to shave etcetera this morning, my fingers will retreat from the keyboard pro tem. And the window for online communication will replace my Grammarly.com writing aid on my computer for up to four hours. See you later.

That's five online sessions now complete and a brief review of some outcomes.

We were meeting officials rather than decision-makers today, and so we were largely asked technical rather than policy questions. We were interested in how carbon trading after the UK leaves the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, probably at the end of the year.

Now, where we go from here is a matter of agreement between all four governments in the UK. The legislation must be agreed by all four Parliaments before it becomes law. So the question is, why is it just this step in the preparation of common frameworks that is being subject to joint decision making? If it applies to one are, why not all.

Generously I will suggest that it is more neglect than intention by most of the people in Whitehall. Would that I could say the same of political leaders down there.

Another meeting since pausing the writing up today's diary was on the subject of capping of student numbers. In May, the Education Ministry responsible for England had become alarmed at the action of a small number of English universities. With the drop off of foreign students due to Brexit and exacerbated by the pandemic, unhelpful recruitment strategies had been adopted. The UK Government consulted with the English Universities and then introduced a cap on the students they could recruit. And penalties for 2021-22 if the cap was breached. They also provided financial help to cover the impact of their new policy. So far, so good.

But they gave no consideration to the impact on Scottish Universities to which many English students come. And provided no financial assistance.

All of this without any prior to, or previous discussions with either our universities or Government. The former may have made legally enforceable offers to prospective students and have no capacity to resile from them.

This an example of not getting the meaning of teamwork, of shared interests.

However, it now transpires that the impact of COVID-19 will cause many students to defer starting their time at university. This diminishes the impact of the rule. But does not help our universities to balance their books.

If know anything, we know that the post-pandemic period will be a long one.

How old will I be before we settle down to a new normal?

Don't know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clarity of vision

I remember standing at a bus stop in Aberdeen when I was a student in the 1960s and realising that I could not quite read the destination on the front of the approaching bus very clearly. I did nothing about it. I was 20 years old and immortal. In 1970 the Commonwealth Games came to Edinburgh for the first time. We got tickets for various events. On one occasion we travelled from Linlithgow, where we had not long bought a house, by train. There was a station adjacent to Meadowbank stadium. But it was a slow journey. So when we later attended some of the badminton competition in an evening, we drove in our elderly car. It may have been that there simply were no trains at the required times. I just don't remember. The drive home predated the building of the motorway between Edinburgh and Linlithgow and was a twisty-turnie local road. It was slightly alarming. I found myself seeing two lines in the middle of the road. Not the normal double white line that prohibits drivers from ...

At home but also working in Parliament

Yesterday was both a good day and a disappointing day. The sun was scorching hot, and although we had our morning tea outside, we had to sit under the parasol. Even our cats, who love basking in the sun, retired to shady spots. The herb garden - can something much less than a metre square be a garden? - makes progress and I chewed my first bit of fennel frond as a tasty mouth freshener. I look forward to shortly stepping out to cut chives for salads, scrambled eggs and the like. And a top day for exercise too. Just under 12 miles' walking. At that distance, a break about half-way makes sense. The country kirk at Ordiquhill provided a step to sit on for 10 minutes in the shade for a drink of water and eating a satsuma. The kirkyard is signposted as part of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission network and also has a War Memorial within it. One name on the Memorial is a family name for my spouse, her grannie was a Lobban, and it prompts me to add Alexander Lobban to a list...

Discussions at a Distance

The pace of change seems to be stepping up. This week will see me participate in eleven online video discussions, only one of which is social. Two are international discussions centred around COVID-19 and its potential long-term effects. The remainder are Parliamentary. But I think we have further transitions in our mode of working to make. We shall have legislation to progress. And I am deeply concerned that this key part of our duties excludes those of us unable to be present physically. With social distancing rules also restricting the number who can be present in the Chamber, the scrutiny is potentially reduced while we are accelerating the pace at which we make new, albeit mostly temporary, new laws. The risk of error is rising, although I cannot see any yet. Others may. Two difficulties exist that need our attention. We don't seem to be able to run sessions where some members are physically present while others are "dialled in" from home. And yet even Westmins...