Skip to main content

101 Primer for being video-online: Part 1 - Preparation

Somebody asked me for this. And like any such description of how I do what I do, it might not suit everyone. Tomorrow we'll talk about some "techie" bits and the "performance".

One of the enduring mysteries for someone working at home is why it works well for some and badly for others. The voice drop-outs, the frozen picture, the awkward framing of the participant, can all contribute to a sense of amateur hour at the local pub. Remember them?

I first started using video-conferencing for real when I was part of a joint information technology project which was a collaboration between a team in Perth, Australia and Edinburgh, Scotland. We had a weekly project meeting at 0800 for Scotland, 1700 for Australia. It was over what we would think of as an impossibly slow communications link. And it worked. Until the clocks changed when we missed each other for a week.

Today video-conferencing is widely available, mostly free, and can use equipment and connections of a vastly superior kind that most of us already have in our home.

So why are many of us finding it so difficult to deliver professional results? Part of the answer is technology. And part is how poorly we humans are using the technology.

Getting it right in our home.

If we go to a broadcaster's studio there's a ritual about it. We are greeted when we arrive. Offered a cup of coffee, shown where the toilets are, generally welcomed into a supportive environment and made to feel welcome. They want the best from our appearance on their show. And we will be at our best when we are attentive, fairly but not totally relaxed, not rushed.

Is that how it is at home?

Are we at our desk early enough to relax into a comfortable seat in front of our computer's camera? Ten minutes before "On Air" time minimum.

And have we arrived dressed for the occasion? Tee-shirts are comfy for us but are they engaging for someone watching? My slippers are my footwear of choice when broadcasting from home. But no-one sees them. Comfort can rule from the waist down. But appearance matters from the waist up.

On the left of my desk is a hairbrush and comb. If your PC uses Windows software, type "Camera" into the "Type here to search" box at the bottom left of the screen. You now see roughly what the other end will see. Reach for that comb and sort that hair.
Simple rules for composing the picture.

Rule one: your eyes should be one-third of the way down from the top of the screen and the screen should be perfectly vertical and at the same height as you are

Rule two: your head should be equally distant from the left and right sides of the screen

Rule three: you should be looking at the camera, or a point close to it (do you know where the camera is? if uncertain, move a sheet of paper just above the screen surface until it blocks the camera. mentally note where it is)

Rule four (alternative 1): if sitting (as one might be if participating in a meeting around a table), you should be the right distance away from the camera that your head fills half the height of the screen

Rule four (alternative 2): if standing up (as giving a lecture; speaking in Parliament) you should be further from the camera so that your head fills about one-third of the height of the screen
AND
put a book on the floor immediately in front of each foot so that you know exactly where to stand when you go live on air (your "mark")

Rule five: check what's in view behind you, in particular look in the corners of the shot, and avoid have any vertical line appearing to "sprout" from the top of your head
OR
Briefly on lighting. A light above and behind, the overhead light. Provides what photographers call the "contre jour" (against the day) effect which provides a slight halo on the hair.

And a light on the opposite side and a bit behind the camera to illuminate the face. All the lighting should be artificial light or all daylight. Mix them and colours may be distorted or excessive contrast created. (See the first picture above; not great is it?)

Finally, record a little bit of speech via the camera application. Do you need to speak up? Or quieten down? Because the acoustics of your home studio is likely to be influenced by hard walls nearby, it will not sound like a studio or Parliament. All that matters is that it can be clearly heard.

Now close down the Camera application. Indeed now is a good time to close down everything that's running on your computer. Restart your Chrome browser which you will need for the broadcast (other browsers might work but you're on your own from here on). Leaving other applications running, even though you cannot see them on screen, risks their "stealing" resources from your video-conferencing at random times. Not good.

The first time you do all this it will take more than ten minutes and is probably best done at least an hour before you are going on air. Gives you time to summon help if needed. The day before may be better.

Now that's the visuals and audio OK.

So what else do we need? Our notes that relate to our contribution. Best on paper and held in the correct order by a staple, treasury tag, or in a binder. If you must have them on screen, I very strongly recommend a second computer.

We should have water to hand. But should not be seen to be drinking it. A dry mouth is probably excessive adrenaline not thirst. Drinking water won't fix that. Speaking of which, do think about a quick visit to the loo.

Paper to write on and two working pens.

Finally, a professionally detached smile, not a big grin, to attach to your face.

We're ready to start.

More in Part 2 tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding the question

Until I looked further into the matter, I had always attributed the phrase, "Two countries divided by a common language", to Winston Churchill. It seems to make sense as he seemed to be referring to his parents, father English, a mother from the United States.

But it seems I shall need to update both my database of quotations and my memory.

Mr Google has taken me to the information that in The Canterville Ghost (1887), Oscar Wilde wrote: "We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language". He also takes me to the suggestion that George Bernard Shaw said, "England and America are two countries divided by a common language".

The question as to which of Wilde or Shaw originated the phrase, if either did, seems to remain open. I do note that Wilde has a clear claim to 1887 while Shaw's writing career came somewhat later. So I plump for Wilde.

Unless Churchill started using this phrase when he was thirteen years old, he…

Non-taxing times

There aren't many substitutes for lived experience. Book learning is more than useful mainly because it fills one's head with questions as well as knowledge.

Being a member of a numerical majority can breed certain unconscious complacencies. Plural. I had no influence over being born white and male. But carry total responsibility for what I then do.

It's not often I will quote a Labour MP with commendation. But a comment article in one of today's papers by such a person caused me to realise that my reaction to recent events was an example of unconscious bias in my thinking.

The UK Prime Minister has announced his economic response to the pandemic. It can be criticised on so many fronts. And my take on it, as with many commentators, was largely economic. It's tiny compared to the need. It's not new money. It provides little or nothing for Scotland and Wales. All true.

Investing in infrastructure is suggested as a way of building a way out of the economic crisis …

Watch my back

Every family is different, and every child will be a distinct character formed by their DNA and by their experience of life. If many of the contacts I have had over the years are anything to go by, grandparents are a vital part of most families. Yesterday's announcement that young children can hug their non-shielding grandparents will be widely welcomed.

It's not something my personal experience has exposed me to. My siblings and I grew up in a family without grandparents. When my parents married at the ages of 32 and 37 all but one of their parents had already died. As the eldest in the family, I overlapped my maternal grandmother's life by a mere fourteen months and have no recollection of her. Indeed I have no photographs of my mother's parents apart from one which may be of me on my grannie's lap. There's no one left to check with.

My family seem to have bred very late in their lives. My youngest grandparent, Alexander Campbell MacGregor, a Gaelic speaker f…