Skip to main content

Blood

Warning to the sensitive. There is some talk of blood today. Not human blood so..

Cats are omnipresent in our house. Even when physically absent, the great outdoors is a big pull for them; they remain in our minds.

Our two, Donald and Madelaine, have a truce with Mr Socks who lives next door. He regularly visits for a chat with them and sits on our right-hand gatepost. Ours sit on the other side and silently commune with him.

There are some disruptive influences. A red monster appears from time to time and, if spotted, is vigorously chased from her domain by Madelaine who is no more than half his size. But then that's the way she is.

Her most impressive defence has been against a local dog fox. She stood on the back step, every hair on full alert so that she looked twice her normal size, waving an armed paw only some two or three feet from his muzzle. Her mouth was open so that her full set of teeth were to be seen complementing a basso profundo growl accompanied by a serious hiss which propelled saliva towards him. I was glad to be behind her not facing such a massive display of aggression.

The fox concluded that he had urgent business elsewhere. And she lept purring onto my lap to receive congratulations and thanks.

But she cannot control everything although she tries. Last night I noticed that the visitors in our field had gifted her a present. At least, I assume that they were the source. A newly arrived tick had attached itself to the back of her neck. It's a reasonable surmise that it was newly arrived because it was not yet engorged with her blood.

It is possible that I am doing our neighbour Gordon whose sheep periodically arrive to cut the grass in our paddock, an injustice. There are other sources of ticks. But the timing is right, and Madelaine is a frequent visitor to that field.

By the time I have finished my daily jottings, I expect tick and cat will have started separate journeys. The infestor to oblivion. Herself back to the field to play double or quits.

For us, the next journey is to the shop. After over a week, even though I was down south for a couple of nights, our fresh supplies are near exhausted.

It's part of the slow edging towards a time beyond the worst stage of the ongoing pandemic that no longer are supermarkets scheduling special times for those of us deemed vulnerable. So we must take our chance with the hoi polloi. But that doesn't mean that we can't schedule our visit for what should be an off-peak period.

So we won't go when people are popping in before work; or after the day's toils. Lunchtime too is likely to see those who have to work away from home stocking up.

So we rose by 0600 in preparation for our shopping.

As ever, the boss has prepared two shopping lists. One simple one with easy-to-find items which profer little discretion in their selection. You guessed it; that's for me. Hers is for the more complex items which require refined and experienced judgement and a keen eye on price. Hers.

Before leaving the house; a full briefing of do's and even more critical, don'ts. I shall be up before the beak as usual later as my performance rarely reaches for 100% spousal satisfaction.

On today's list will be garlic bread which will provide the underpinnings for bruschetta to be consumed by me, accompanied by suitable liquid refreshment, during my fortnightly meeting with former colleagues from my pre-Parliamentary career. One clear advantage of social isolation is the opportunity to consume unlimited quantities of foods which you do not want to make your constituents aware of your having eaten.

A minor rule of politics, garlic on your breath loses you votes.

In a sense, it's good that my much missed late pal and former colleague Joe, will not be with us tonight. He spent many years attending classes in Italian. While it had a practical application during his wife and his many trips to Italy, it also was an important social activity in his retirement. Indeed in his last few days after a severe stroke, most of the words he spoke were Italian verbs. They were at the front of his very damaged brain.

He would have been driven to fury, as usual, at our hopeless attempts to pronounce "bruschetta". It was never very clear whether it was a faux distress designed to wind us all up or a deep-seated protectedness of his beloved Italian. Probably both.

But "brew-sh-etta" said anywhere within his hearing would lead to a deep growl followed by some Anglo-Saxon vocabulary. He would remind us that it is "bruce-ket-ta". It is lost without that hard "k".

Removing the former from my vocabulary tonight is the challenge. Replacing it with the latter a suitable homage to someone much missed.

I wrote yesterday about my having a new DNA match with one of my Parliamentary colleagues. A response to my email has confirmed that we are shown as being related as 5th to 8th cousins. Spotting and understanding this match is non-trivial. I have over 120 new matches this week alone.

In this case, knowing that we share DNA, 11 centiMorgans in a single DNA segment if you want to know, is just the start. It means we share an ancestor who was born anywhere from the mid-1500s up to about 1750. It may well be that that person is absent from any of the research we have undertaken to develop our respective trees. Narrowing the research down to people in our respective families who lived relatively close together is a strategy worth starting with. And for the dates covering the joining of our two trees together, there was much more limited migration than now.

I suspect another project for the summer. And will we be "coming out"? Depends on what scandals we discover en route to our goal. Their tree looks a bit more likely to be "clean" than mine.

Next week sees our SNP Group Convenor, Bruce Crawford stepping down. After our AGM on Monday. It's not an easy job; I know as I did it between 2003 and 2007 in simpler times and when there were far fewer us.

But I already know that the post will be filled by competent candidate who will keep us on track with similar good humour, team spirit and occasional sympathy that characterised Bruce's tenure. Thanks, Bruce.
Finally, I have today added another cartoon of me to the collection. I knew that my mention of peacocks in Parliament would attract the attention of Liam Kirkcaldy of Holyrood Magazine. And it did (see https://www.holyrood.com/comment/view,sketch-stewart-stevenson-kidnaps-a-peacock_15681.htm).

Liam, as they nearly say in the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy":

"So long and thanks for all the peacocks".


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Through the keyhole

There used to be a TV quiz show called "Through the Keyhole" . I think I was not much addicted to it and may only have seen it once or twice. Basically, TV cameras went into a celebrity's home and filmed what it looked like. And then the show's panellists had to work out whose home it was. I have never been able to work out what a celebrity actually is. It seems to be someone who is famous for being famous. One of the daftest inventions of modern time. Being lauded for being who you are is a very long way short of being lauded for what one has done. Not that my immediate family has been entirely immune. My nephew Jamie appeared on "They Think It's All Over" in 2003. A supposedly famous sports person appears and the panel had to work out who they were. In Jamie's case, they failed. Although the first UK male to win a World Championship in orienteering, his achievements seemed to have passed them by. But he did win a gold bar as his prize. Whe...

A non-Christmas pantomime

It's a sign of the developing new normal in my personal life that the past week only saw me walk on only four of the seven days. Not because of any desire to avoid exercise, I spent 80 minutes on the rowing machine at a high-intensity 40 cycles per minute instead, no. My days are busier. Filled with timetabled commitments that make it difficult to find the two hours and twenty minutes that I spent walking 7.34 miles last Thursday, for example. Now there are other uses to which I could have put such a period. I could have been a member of a pantomime parliament and stood patiently in line to vote three times as some did in London yesterday. But actually, that required a full three hours, forty minutes more than I used for exercise on my last "big walk". In our Parliament, three votes would have taken about 3 to 4 minutes. A voting period of one minute for the first, 30 seconds for each of the following ones and up to a couple of minutes for the Presiding Officer to c...

Transportation

For the first time in several months, I was able to fit in an hour of family tree research. That came after my breakfast, porridge and local strawberries, reading the papers and now sitting down to write up my daily diary. The prompt for today's research was an email from one of the family tree databases to which I subscribe. Yesterday was even more exciting. A DNA match with the same name as one of my Parliamentary colleagues. While it would be a breach of privacy to be specific, the name only occurs twice in Scotland's birth records since modern records started in 1855. And in world-wide records only a further two. The person whose DNA I match has provided no information apart from their name so I shall need to see what response I get to my email. But back to this morning's research. That involved the main criminal in my family tree. You've always suspected ... ? Don't get too excited as I share no DNA with this person. Their family married into mine. Mind...